Back to Calculators
Performance

Heart Rate Zones Calculator

Training in the right heart rate zone is the difference between building an aerobic base and grinding out junk miles. These 5 zones cover everything from active recovery to maximal effort.

Your Heart Rate Data

Used to estimate max heart rate if not measured directly.

Best measured during a max-effort test. Leave blank to use 220 − age.

Measure first thing in the morning before getting up. Used for Karvonen method.

Your Result

❤️

Enter your age and resting heart rate to calculate your training zones.

📋 What Your Result Means

For educational purposes only — not medical advice.

The results above show your personalised heart rate zones. Use these ranges to guide your training intensity each session.

Zone 2 should form the bulk (70-80%) of your training volume (Seiler & Tonnessen, 2009). This develops your aerobic base, improves mitochondrial density, and trains your body to burn fat efficiently. Zone 4-5 work should make up the remaining 20%. This "polarised" distribution — where you go easy on easy days and hard on hard days — was found to be superior to threshold-focused training across all six performance outcomes measured in trained athletes (Stoggl & Sperlich, 2014; DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00033).

The most common mistake: Recreational athletes tend to train too hard on easy days and too easy on hard days, spending most of their time in Zone 3 — the "grey zone." This intensity is too low to stimulate VO₂max adaptation and too high to allow full recovery, leading to chronic fatigue and stalled progress. If you can't hold a conversation, you're above Zone 2.

HRmax accuracy: The "220 - age" formula has a standard deviation of ±10-12 bpm, meaning your actual max heart rate could be 20+ bpm different from the estimate. The Tanaka formula (208 - 0.7 × age) is more accurate (Tanaka et al. 2001; DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01054-8), but a field max-effort test remains the best approach. If your zones feel wrong — easy runs feel too hard, or hard intervals feel too easy — your HRmax estimate is likely off.

Max HR estimate: 220 − age (Tanaka: 208 − 0.7 × age is more accurate)

Karvonen (HRR): Target HR = ((HRmax − HRrest) × intensity%) + HRrest

Zone 1: 50–60% HRR · Zone 2: 60–70% · Zone 3: 70–80% · Zone 4: 80–90% · Zone 5: 90–100%
Karvonen MJ et al. — The effects of training on heart rate: a longitudinal study (1957)
Annales Medicinae Experimentalis et Biologiae Fenniae · Volume 35(3)
Seiler S & Tønnessen E — Intervals, Thresholds, and Long Slow Distance (2009)
Sportscience · Vol 13 · Polarised training model overview · sportsci.org
Tanaka H et al. — Age-Predicted Maximal Heart Rate Revisited (2001)
Journal of the American College of Cardiology · DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01054-8 · 208 - 0.7 × age formula
Stöggl T & Sperlich B — Polarized Training Has Greater Impact on Key Endurance Variables (2014)
Frontiers in Physiology · DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00033 · Polarised vs threshold training comparison
✓ Strong Evidence

Want to learn more? Read our in-depth article: Zone 2 Training: Why Slowing Down Makes You Faster →

Advertisement · 728×90

📚 Recommended Reading

🤝 Amazon-Partner: Als Amazon-Partner verdiene ich an qualifizierten Verkäufen. · As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

📖
Outlive — Peter Attia (2023)
Practical longevity framework where Zone 2 training is a cornerstone of cardiovascular health strategy.
View on Amazon →
📖
Endure — Alex Hutchinson (2018)
The science behind endurance performance, including how heart rate zones relate to lactate threshold and fatigue.
View on Amazon →

🛠 Recommended Tools

🤝 Amazon-Partner: Als Amazon-Partner verdiene ich an qualifizierten Verkäufen. · As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

❤️
Chest Strap Heart Rate Monitor (~$30)
View on Amazon →
📱
Running Armband for Phone (~$10)
View on Amazon →